![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjaH67V0L0U7mGo8zRNEZgf7NFtu6eOM51HoVnljBIUbX7FTu2tb89viUX88hyp3has_JqSw0b2PsG9hTdrq_OGQuRtJ5bgsby2DkHNoqBDVuTGflfalnydmifBjtBnnl0sOUbwWnuiYck/s200/olympus_e5_back.png)
In the totality of their reviews, the E-5 lands in third place. Third?! Even stranger is the standing of other cameras. The Canon EOS 1D (Mark IV AND III) has a greater image quality rating than the juggernaut-like Nikon D3x. All of which, including the APS-C EOS 7D, are above the EOS 1Ds Mark III. I like Olympus, and 4/3's, and I certainly hope that E-5 is good, but I'm eating a bowl-full of salt with these results. It is simply impossible that a sensor that is 1/4 the size of a full-frame camera will match it for image quality. The resolution just isn't there.
FotoMagazin Leaderboard
No comments:
Post a Comment
All posts are moderated, so it may take a day for your comment to appear.